Some people believe that governments are spending more money on wild life. This money should be used for other works. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Although

, a plethora of people believe that there is no need to spend money and human source for the

protection

of wild

animals

. They

also

admit that there is no need for wild creatures

this

century. I quarrel with the statement to a larger extent for some reasons. My position is argued

further

with the explanations. Out of all the reasons, the foremost one is,

food

chain mechanism will be disturbed due to lack of

protection

in wild

animals

.

Therefore

,

this

leads to a shortage of

food

for people to survive. The unbalanced

food

chain causes to increase in the population of other nonhunting animal creatures who usually live in the city area. To add to

this

, some crucial animal materials like perfume, leather, and jewellery, and so on, would not be available

further

.

Additionally

, if we would not

care

about wild

animals

then

some of them will be extinct in the

next

few years.

For example

, Pandas. Surprisingly only a few pandas are left in the world. So, people need to take

care

of

this

dying species as much as. To illustrate

this

, “China” is spending its special budget to

care

for pandas. China builds special

care

centres for them and appoints some specialists for special treatment.

However

, I would not overlook the other side too. The spending resources on wild animal

protection

can create national loss to the government. That can cause poor development in the country. For

an

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

instant, Africa is spending many resources on their wildlife sanctuary but, they are not able to recover their expenses and create national debt for the country.

Thus

, to conclude the discussion, it can be

finally

said that,

although

there are several losses for giving

protection

to wildlife

animals

, I believe that it is important to save wild

animals

and protect them to keep

food

chain mechanism.

Also

, it is our prime duty to protect the species which are less intelligent than humans.