Although
, many experts believe that for the development of a nation, an authority should spend more money to educate Linking Words
science
rather than other courses. I think in a reverse manner and quarrel with the given statement. My inclination is justified in the following paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments, the foremost one to prove my opinion is, other subjects are Use synonyms
also
very important in the country’s development. It cannot be denied that for a country to develop all possible subjects are equally important in their unique way. Linking Words
For example
, accounts, management, history, languages, geography, statistics, and sports too play a crucial role to develop any country. Linking Words
This
all together builds the strong economy of the particular province.
Another reason to prove my point is that other studies can help to backup Linking Words
science
. Use synonyms
For instance
, language is important for the explanation of the concept, history is used to explain how technology advanced over time. Linking Words
Moreover
, all people do not incline Linking Words
science
because that can lead to unemployment and discontent amongst people.
Use synonyms
On the contrary
, some people believe that Linking Words
science
should get more funding from central authorities. They Use synonyms
also
believe that Linking Words
science
is an epicentre of the progress of the nation. Use synonyms
That is
to say, developed countries like the United States have gain momentum mostly by funding a large number of Linking Words
science
subjects. They spend money to make world-class labs in many schools.
To conclude, it can be said that Use synonyms
although
Linking Words
science
is the centre of the process and development of a country, it would be impractical and illogical for the government to invest more only in Use synonyms
this
topic. My reason proves the importance of the subject too.Linking Words
shahparth163