It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

Wildlife

plays a vital role in our lives. It is thought by some that

wildlife

conservation projects are funded by the government more than they are supposed to be considering the prevalence of other pressing issues. I entirely disagree with

this

view and think that the protection of animals leads to the overall improvement of society.

Firstly

,

wildlife

conservation efforts contribute to alleviating all the other environmental problems because a large part of it is improving the habitat for animals.

This

would include planting trees in forests and regulating littering and emissions of harmful substances. Spending governmental money on animal protection, for

this

reason, is a cost-effective way to address all the environmental issues that the country is facing. In Japan,

for instance

, in order to save the White Stork, which lives in the central part of Japan and was on the verge of extinction, the government focused on habitat preservation along with breeding efforts.

Consequently

, not only was the species successfully reintroduced into the wild, the air and water quality of the region significantly improved, which benefited the local residents. Some might argue that the conservation of

wildlife

has no positive impact on social issues

such

as poverty and homelessness. I

nevertheless

believe that the improvement of the natural habitat for animal species could have a favourable effect on the country's economy.

This

is because the cleaner landscape and natural areas with rich ecosystems would attract tourists. Increased tourist revenue certainly boosts the economy and

this

additional fund could be used to tackle social problems. A good example is Singapore, which imposes strict restrictions in order to keep the environment clean and enjoys a considerable amount of tourism income

as a result

. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the idea that the government should allocate

less

Change the quantifier

fewer

show examples

funds to protecting

wildlife

. It is crucial that a country ensure healthy ecosystems for environmental and social sustainability.