Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Scientific research is a “catch-all” term to illustrate the analysis of science in every domain of our life from behavioural mechanisms to the formation of subjects.
As a result
,
this
leads to the questioning against the ownership of these
experiments
between the national authority and the financially independent labels. Personally, from the viewpoint of a bystander, I perceive that neither of them outweighs the other. In terms of the science-based studies, they leave an annual financial burden on the involved partners’ budget which in the long run, is a contribution to the depletion of the governmental revenue. Every year, the regularly updated statistics have supported the idea of huge investment in
this
field that mere cost for the maintenance of labs’ facilities has burned billion dollars from the investors.
Moreover
, when it comes to the national pocket, most of it is from the mandatary tax policy from the domestic revenue which will see the occurrence of protests on the rising of tax for
such
experiments
.
Therefore
, in regard to the financial maintenance in
this
field,
this
will leave the companies an upper hand to handle.
However
, on the other side of the coin,
this
puts a concern on the surveillance of these scientific
experiments
. Without national supervision, the conduction of these
experiments
lays a worry in their consequences which are hidden from society. In the mid of 19th century, without the control of the authority, many unethically psychological
experiments
such
as Stanford prison
experiments
had been conducted which had resulted in far-reaching continuous consequences to the involved participants and the society as a whole till here and now. In conclusion, as it has shown that each of these owners has their own strong suit, I am still quite sceptical to come to the very
last
decision between them.
Submitted by haioanhcongviec on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • scientific research
  • socially responsible outcomes
  • corporate profit
  • profit motives
  • fundamental areas
  • long-term societal development
  • innovative research outcomes
  • mixed approach
  • stifle innovation
  • bureaucratic processes
  • breakthrough projects
  • commercial gain
  • scientific progress
  • public access
  • government funding
  • private sector
  • public benefit
What to do next:
Look at other essays: