Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I would agree to the far extent with the statement that tourists from overseas should outlay more money than green card holders of a province.

Firstly

, tourism is the backbone of economic development for several countries.

For instance

,

places

such

as Bali and Thailand are the heart of tourist destinations. That being said, non-residents travel to these areas for recreational purposes.

However

, if the prices to visit old monuments and historical

places

become relatively higher than the citizen's, it might discourage a minority of travellers to visit a certain country. But as a resident of an area, there should be a certain priority to be accumulated to benefit from their birthplace. Not only are the citizen's taxpayers but

also

contribute to the reconstruction and preservation of their traditional venues.

Secondly

, Foreigners need to bear in mind the cost of educating themselves about an area. The purpose of travelling

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

not only to relax but

also

to engage in a new culture as well as

investing

Change the verb form

to invest

show examples

in them. To illustrate

this

, overseas visitors may buy souvenirs, clothes and so forth.

This

will play a significant role

on

Change preposition

in

show examples

the growth of the country as

tourist

Add an article

the tourist

show examples

industry is one of the highest income for most countries. To conclude, attraction

places

of a certain area should charge more for a different nationality than the locals. Visitors should be able to benefit a country indirectly by purchasing cultural items and going to historical

places

by

Change preposition

at

show examples

an extra cost.