Some people believe that natural ability is necessary to be successful at sports. Others believe that hardwork and practice is more important. Discuss both the sides and add your own opinion.

The argument about what talents succeed in

sportive

activities and the source of

skills

has been discussing by the community for a long time.

Although

some believe

skills

are given by birth and genetically transmits from generation to generation, others consider talents are given by birth but never improve without working. According to the

first

approach, the abilities are gifts given by the god and they are transferred by genes to descendants.

Therefore

, training will not contribute to

skills

to be successful in sporting games.

For example

, İf the genes of someone was coded to be a talent into the DNA, the

next

generations will carry similar specialities.

However

, scientific researches indicate, people do not have only

sportive

talents but

also

have different

skills

.

For example

, some have

skills

in sciences

such

as mathematic, philosophy, and physic, while others have

sportive

capabilities. Obviously, just as people cannot improve their capabilities in

science

without working, they are not able to develop

sportive

abilities with training for the purpose of being successful. Even if working is the main instrument of being an achiever, numerous factors influence achievements. The experiences indicate, using

science

and technology is as significant as genetic factors and hard-working to get success. To illustrate,

to begin

with, defining which part of the body must be built and what type of muscle should be trained.

In addition

, how body mass index can be calculated and what average weight of the body.

Further

, determining the proper methods of training and feeding can be determined by the

science

to reach achievements. İn conclusion, as well as the natural abilities, hard-working and

science

influence sportsmen and women in order to be successful.