Although many people value their public parks, this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever-growing population or to develop business and boost economies. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?

It is clear that the urban population is increasing at a noticeable speed, and the citizens’ requests might be pressure by social resources. Even though many
people
value their public
parks
, others suggest that it is better to replace
parks
with business or residential areas to meet their growing demand for land. I find
this
point of view very dissatisfactory.
Firstly
, green places play a significant role in sustaining and improving
people
’s health. Before anything else, trees and plants in
parks
can absorb carbon dioxide and other chemicals, as well as provide us oxygen which helps to improve that area’s air condition.
This
improvement can be essential to
people
who has breathing problems due to air pollution. Another reason to maintain public
parks
is many
people
can keep fit by doing exercises or doing public sports like badminton or football there. Daily exercises make a person healthier by improving their circulatory and immune system, building a stronger body plus protecting them from illness.
Secondly
, cities which have
parks
and gardens look more appealing than those which don’t. If a city had only skyscrapers, industrial areas and housing estate, it would be pretty boring and dull;
therefore
, the greens and flowers can make the city brighter and more colourful,
thus
bringing
people
closer to nature.
Finally
, changing
parks
into business and residential places is not an effective solution to the yearly expanding population.
Instead
, the government should build more satellite centres outside of crowding urban areas.
This
would not only solve the high rate of jobless workers but
also
decreased air pollution caused by traffic in cities. In conclusion, I believe that public
parks
benefit both the citizens and the panoramic view of the city, and there are alternative solutions to deal with growing needs for land use,
such
as building more suburb or suburban
Submitted by haioanhcongviec on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: