Large companies use sports events to promote their products. Some people think this has a negative impact on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

#companies #sports #events #products #people #impact

Recently, commercial advertisements have proliferated in a variety of television channels, newspapers or magazines

as a result

of fierce competition in the market.

Thus

, there is a growing trend in which major companies popularise their

products

by approaching

sports

events

. Whether it slaves or liberates

sports

has been a subject of debate. In my viewpoint, I do not lean towards

this

trend and below is my discussion. On the one hand, it is widely believed that collaborating with huge companies enables

sports

events

to meet a high quality of facilities and standards. To illustrate, companies are likely to donate money just for the appearances of their logos, brand names or

products

at those

events

Consequently

sports

producers can afford high costs of accommodation, devices or lighting.

Additionally

, watchers can

also

be beneficial by not having to pay for tickets thanks to sponsors.

This

means people can have equal opportunities to attend

sports

events

As a result

this

can create a healthy partnership that gains profits for both sides.

On the other hand

, I side with those who advocate that advertising can cause unexpecting harm to

sports

leagues.

First

of all, there are some misbehaviours of watchers and fans when it comes to unhealthy

products

For instance

, football fans who are adolescents will be encouraged to consume alcohol or tobacco if they see these

products

are used by their favourite players. In fact, Tiger-a famous beer company usually appears on

sports

channels.

Secondly

, having too many advertisements may offend some audiences since they are easily distracted from watching and as a consequence, some of them tend to lose interest in

sports

. Literally, they regard

sports

nowadays as nothing but a tool for the money. In conclusion, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. I do believe that everything needs a limitation so

sports

should not rely too much on advertisements.

Submitted by Như Hảo on Fri Aug 20 2021

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

10Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
3Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Grammar mistakes
 

4 paragraphs

307 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 8.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 9.0

Complete response

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

4.5
band
Some people believe that activities of large multinational companies mostly benefit the economies of developing countries, other people take the opposite view and feel these large multinationals are harmful. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are people who believe that multinational enterprises are good to the local economy of developing nations, whereas another people argue that these international companies bring negative consequences. I think there are pros and cons, which will detailed in the next lines.
7.5
band
İn some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both two views and give your opinion.
The most debatable argument worldwide is about the salary earned in various sectors of our community. Few arguments support how the earnings of an individual can be justified equivalence of their type of work and beneficial for the country. On the other hand, some expect that leading authority may anticipate dominance over the salary and put a cap on it. In my perspective, the higher wages are received by the amount of risk driven in particular work within the regulations set by the government.
5
band
In the past, knowledge was stored in books. Today, people stored knowledge on the Internet. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
The way of storing knowledge changed from books to the internet in the past decades. This led to the controversial issue debating on the topic whether the change of place where people stored their knowledge contributed to positive or negative outcomes. However, after a thorough consideration, though it provides some drawback, it is strongly believed that the beneficial parts should not be put down by any chance.
5
band
In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history about house or building they live in. What are reason for this? how can people research it?
It is no denying that individuals want to know about the history of houses or apartments they actually stay in a number of countries. There are several reasons for this, because people need to know the value of their place more specifically, and also need more information to expand or reconstruct their buildings. To find out the information, citizens can use government's system as it is normally open to the public.
5.5
band
Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Advanced technology has taken over people's lives in recent times. It is argued that life was less complex in the past when there was no technology. I completely disagree with this statement and believe that sophisticated technology has made our lives more convenient and less laborious and improved the education system.

Large companies use sports events to promote their products. Some people think this has a negative impact on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

Some people believe that activities of large multinational companies mostly benefit the economies of developing countries, other people take the opposite view and feel these large multinationals are harmful. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

İn some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both two views and give your opinion.

In the past, knowledge was stored in books. Today, people stored knowledge on the Internet. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history about house or building they live in. What are reason for this? how can people research it?

Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree or disagree?