In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries some people believe that this is good for the country, but other's think that goverments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
There is a controversial issue today related to whether the stipend has to have a specific limit or has not been curbed because of some tangible benefits for the nations.
While
this
will delve into the details of both points of view, it will also
shed light on my opinion that will be elucidated,along with
some corporations.
To begin
with, admittedly, the majority of nations offer high stipends for a small number of the public;on the other hand
,plenty of citizens get low stipends.Therefore
, there's no doubt,that some drawbacks were expressed on account of this
strategy. To illustrate this
,for instance
, in the U.K.,back in 1970,the stipend of the public was on a downward trend,the other pattern can be seen in some jobs which were restricted for a few individuals.As a result
, plenty of people emigrated to other nations. Another drawback to the major companies was the number of redundancies increased dramatically.Therefore
, the inflation,as well as
some fiscal crises were on the surge.
In spite of the aforementioned clarifications,others claim in order to achieve some economic advantages ,what the government has to do is raise the salaries of specific people.With the aim of achieving this
strategy, the idea of a certain level of income has to be given up. To elucidate this
,take Egypt as a clear example there are no boundaries to earning a high salary.The ensued of this
was In 2000 when its loan arrears ran down at a remarkably high level. Moreover
, taxes and debt were curtailed significantly.
In a nutshell, after a thorough analysis of the mentioned topic, it is predicted that it is not fair to offer high salaries for a handful number of the public,whereas
the majority of the public gets low income,because of the aforementioned clarifications. While
the mentioned clarifications support this
idea,also
this
is my firm beliefSubmitted by nadeenelkenawy4425 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure you have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. The introduction should clearly state the overview of the topic and your thesis statement. The main body should have paragraphs with clear main ideas, and the conclusion should summarize your discussion and restate your opinion effectively.
coherence cohesion
Use cohesive devices appropriately to clearly link ideas and arguments. Ensure that pronouns refer back to the correct noun, that sequential words are used to order your points, and that transition words are employed to show the relationship between ideas.
task achievement
Fully address the task by discussing both sides of the argument and stating your own opinion. Each paragraph should correspond to a specific point of view, supported by examples or evidence, with a clear topic sentence.
task achievement
Deliver clear and comprehensive ideas overall. Avoid ambiguity and ensure that your arguments are developed logically and thoroughly. This means that your paragraphs should be fleshed out with explanations and examples where relevant.
task achievement
Use relevant and specific examples to support your points. General statements should be substantiated with clear illustrations or data where possible, as this will add weight to your arguments and help to fully satisfy the task requirements.