Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. Do you agree or disagree?

The question of whether mobile

phones

should be regulated in public areas including common sites at school, in-stores and transport hubs has become progressive contentious. In my opinion, while

this

notion is an effective implication on social interactions, a complete ban is unrealistic and not feasible. The frequently cited rationale for

this

reform being viable is the reinforced communication that it would bring. People these days tend to stare at their

phones

most of the time and make minimal efforts to hold conversations in public. One of the salient illustrations of

this

is often indicated in public spots including bus stops, parks and supermarkets. Compare

this

with decades ago before the advent of smartphones, our former generations had to resort to talking with each other, or at least reading a book to curb social anxiety. Had mobile

phones

been limited to use in

such

places, there would have a carry-on effect on potential friendships, interactive conversations and youngsters being more sociable and dynamic. Albeit I concede the merits of

this

development like the one mentioned, I would still contend that banning

phones

is purely theoretical. The majority of jobs nowadays are involved with mobile usage and these devices have become indispensable.

This

can be most apparently seen in the cases of doctors or teachers, whose jobs would necessitate being available by phone throughout the day, so as is common with library officers and bus operators.

Thus

, mobile

phones

restricted to use in the workplace seem irrelevant.

Moreover

, they have served as important escapes for people to minimise boredom during breaks and while waiting.

Therefore

, allowing phone usage in shared places confers a valid standpoint as they have become not only a form of entertainment but

also

a key ingredient in working life. In conclusion, the value of

this

proposal cannot outweigh its pernicious effect as

this

might disrupt daily operations at work. In my final thought, governors and regulators should propose a more holistic approach in order to strike some balance in the use of mobile

phones

in public.