Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?

Many people presume that the motive of most countries should be to increase their production of goods, while others argue

in contrast

to that. The  increasing manufacture of commodities is indispensable to meet the growing demands of people, but

this

reason alone is not enough to make it an appropriate target.

This

essay tends to discuss why I believe that manufacturing more materials is not a significant goal.

Firstly

, producing more of a product than can be consumed creates waste which can exacerbate air pollution.

Additionally

, overproduction of materials would gradually cause depletion of natural resources.

For example

, more and more fossils fuels are being used up by large factories to make things. Excess paper manufacture causes deforestation

hence

loss of biodiversity.

Secondly

, there are several others topics

which

Correct pronoun usage

that

show examples

deserve to be the

first

priority of a state.

For instance

, the money and time spent for making goods can be used for improving public transportation and constructing railways.

This

would facilitate the usage of public transport for commuting rather than private vehicles.

Thus

it would greatly reduce  our carbon footprints and eventually ease global warming. These resources can

also

be used for protecting wildlife,

such

as by building Wildlife Sanctuaries, which is necessary to maintain ecological balance. In short, these resources can be used for the betterment of

environment

Correct article usage

the environment

show examples

and mankind. To conclude,

although

some commodities are needed for our day to day lives, we should limit the creation of those things as excessive manufacturing has several drawbacks.

Therefore

, I strongly disagree with the statement.