Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

#animals #place #st #century #waste #resources

Some people argued that protecting wild

animals

in the 21st century is a waste of resources as they have no place. I totally disagree with the statement. On the one hand, it would be

absurb

Correct your spelling

absurd

to state that wild

animals

have no place in the 21st century as they help balance the circle of life. Herbivores and carnivores help maintain the harmony of nature as the herbivores consume grass and plants while carnivores hunt herbivores to survive and their flesh would feed the earth when they die. As

such

, disrupting the cycle could bring catastrophic consequences to mother nature.

Furthermore

, maintaining the diversity of species in natural parks can help boost tourism and generate revenue. People have always been fascinated by the beauty of the wild and would willing to spend money to explore and observe wild creatures.

As a result

, wild

animals

haven

Correct your spelling

have

show examples

proven their place in the 21st century.

On the other hand

, protecting wild

animals

have never been a waste of resources. By keeping the

animals

safe, we

also

help conserve and preserve their habitats, resulting in a healthy environment for all living creatures to stay.

Additionally

, there

are

Change the verb form

show examples

enough space for humans and

animals

to coexist together, and to eradicate or neglect wild

animals

would be irresponsible. If

such

visions were true, the drawbacks would

outweight

Correct your spelling

outweigh

the benefits significantly and it would take tremendous efforts to restore what was lost. In conclusion, protecting wild

animals

and their habitat should always be one of the top priorities to ensure the survivability of our beautiful planet.

Submitted by vuanhnguyenduc on Tue Aug 24 2021

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

for example
for instance
to illustrate this
to give a clear example
such as
namely
to illustrate
take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

6Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
1Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Grammar mistakes
 

4 paragraphs

258 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 6.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 6.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 6.0

Complete response

7.5

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 checks
Get all the feedback you need to keep improving your charts and letters.
Unlimited Task 2 checks
Practice and perfect your skills with essays.
Personalized suggestions
Know how to boost your score.
Detailed mistakes analysis
Get instant feedback. Spot every mistake.
Topic ideas generator
Get topic-specific ideas to enhance your writing.
Vocabulary helper
Get the right words for any topic.
Progress tracking
Track your writing improvements.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

4.5
band
Some people view teenage conflict with their parents as a necessary part of growing up, whilst others see it as something negative which should be avoided. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
Without shallow for doubt that teenage years are one of the important parts of every person. Some people think that conflicts between parents and youngster is valid for the growing process, while others think that family should avoid that problem. From my point of view, that essential stage of minor's development has negative and positive sides.
7
band
Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages. Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?
In adolescence, various behaviours are had by youngsters ranging from good or bad behaviours. These behaviours of young people of the same age are able to affect others. Some believe that peer pressure is necessary, while others feel this can bring adverse effects. Despite the advantages, the disadvantages of this issue are more significant.
7.5
band
Many people in poor countries die from diseases that are curable because they cannot afford the medication required. Do you believe that drug companies should make their products available at reduced prices in these countries?
It is true that a huge amount of people in the world have passed away over the years from diseases because of a lack of ability to access the healthcare system and medication. In my opinion, the world citizen's health is important, so medical costs should be reduced to match their financial ability.
8
band
Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The influence of childhood upbringing on adulthood preparedness has numerous discussions about it. Some argue that kids raised in families with limited financial resources are better equipped to handle the challenges of adulthood compared to those from affluent backgrounds. However, others argue that ones who are brought up in wealthy households have a greater ability to orient themselves in their future.
6
band
Present a written argument or case study to an educational reader with no specialised knowledge of the following topic: The overuse of natural resources causes an ultimate exhaust of them. People have been using them to be in the swim of new styles such as making new furniture of recent design. This causes a huge harm to the environment. Therefore, the government should discourage people the overuse of these resources. To what extent do you support or oppose the idea?
It is a widely held belief that communities are demolishing the beauty of nature for their needs day by day. However, this trend has an adverse effect on our surroundings.

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Some people view teenage conflict with their parents as a necessary part of growing up, whilst others see it as something negative which should be avoided. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.

Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages. Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?

Many people in poor countries die from diseases that are curable because they cannot afford the medication required. Do you believe that drug companies should make their products available at reduced prices in these countries?

Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families. To what extent do you agree or disagree?