Some people believe that goverments should fund and promote artistic and cultural activities for their citizens. Others, however, think that these activities should be left to private individuals and institutions. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is a piece of staggering evidence that numerous citizens acknowledge that artistic and cultural actions should be advertised and subsidized within a nation's society.
In contrast
, many others depict the endorsement of these movements and reckon that it is best if individuals and private organizations are the ones who regulate them. Although
the funding of it could prosper artists
from being financially restricted, this
essay coincides with giving liberty to art
and cultural objectives to make artists
feeling free without any constraints.
First
and foremost, the subsidization and publicity of arts could profit artists
economically, without the urge to worry about monetary burden. Additionally
, they are also
being guaranteed exposure from the government to ensure that their innovations are viewed by society. But the real problem is that the administration would try to implement some laws to these artists
to restrain their creativeness. For example
, countries with a dictator history like Belarus, Russia are awarding artists
with grants, but they need to obey specific statutes. These red flags are the apparent indications of the cons of state allocation.
On the other hand
, providing freedom to personas who create magical arts is tremendously beneficial to push them out of their comfort zones. In addition
, with the easiness to develop their abilities in an absolute path, these artists
could grow their potential further
without worrying about particular regulations restricting them from getting creative. Furthermore
, when well-known art
centers
are discovering their imaginative creations, Change the spelling
centres
this
could be a helping hand for them to gain attention and creating earnings. For example
, a friend of mine has a genuine love for drawing, and she posts her projects on social media platforms. One time, she was noticed by an American art
center
who desperately wanted to buy her Change the spelling
centre
art
, and without any hesitation, she sold it and earned a decent amount of dimes. These are the visible indications of why it is better to let creative humans designing whatever they desire.
In conclusion, although
it might be very crucial to subsidize artists
to prevent them from monetary insecurity, the sovereignty that is
given to these creative inventors outweighs the allowance from a state's regime, giving them unlimited space to formulate valuable arts and enabling them to pursue their best interests in their preferred ways.Submitted by andrianhasif on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?