Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this is a bad example to adolescents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In these days and ages, it is true that some

celebrities

Use synonyms

are now known for their lavish lifestyles rather than their contributions to society. Some feel that

this

Linking Words

tendency has a negative impact on young people. I partly consider that view. On the one hand, well-known persons have an impact on the community, particularly their followers. Many influences, especially their idols whom they consider role models, might affect a teenager's personality and conduct during puberty. Take,

for example

Linking Words

, obsessive fans. When they see their idols' exotic and affluent lifestyles, they fight to mimic and own similar goods, despite their financial constraints.

This

Linking Words

promotes materialistic lives, which can have both emotional and physical consequences for impressionable teens.

However

Linking Words

, it is not the flashy lifestyle of superstars

that is

Linking Words

to blame for

this

Linking Words

problem. Clearly, the family and nurture environment, rather than

celebrities

Use synonyms

' flashy lifestyles, have a greater influence on influencing children's behaviour. It is critical for everyone to learn to live within their means and to adhere to an ethical code of conduct.

In addition

Linking Words

, there are at least as many

celebrities

Use synonyms

whose achievements qualify them as outstanding role models for children. They show a lot of effort, determination, and ambition, all of which are necessary for someone to be truly successful in their chosen industry. To summarize, while

celebrities

Use synonyms

have an impact on the community, blaming them for the misdeeds of their young fans is incorrect. Each person should have their own moral convictions to lead them through life, and no one should be expected to follow in the footsteps of others.