It is more important forschool children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that some commentators argue that it is more necessary for

children

to

study

local

history

than the

history

of the

world

. While I agree that school

children

should learn about local

history

, I believe that schools should

study

the

history

of the

world

. On the one hand, it is more significant for

children

to

study

local

history

.

Firstly

,

by

Change preposition

apply

show examples

knowing about the past of their country forms a sense of belonging and pride in each child.

For example

, when

children

learn about how their earlier generations fought and made sacrifices for their freedom of the country, they will appreciate the value of life and liberty they enjoy today.

Secondly

, as youngsters have a deep understanding of the origins and core values of their nation, they will be motivated to carry on the best customs for generations to come.

On the other hand

, schoolchildren should be encouraged to have

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

knowledge of the

history

of the

world

. The current trend towards globalisation

make

Change the verb form

makes

show examples

it more necessary for pupils to know about ethnic groups and other cultures.

This

will form a mutual understanding of the origins and

value

Fix the agreement mistake

values

show examples

of countries over the

world

. Another important factor is that a

study

of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

world

history

provides the youngster with

the

Correct article usage

an

show examples

overview of the inter-relation of nations and how international historical events,

such

as colonisation, shaped contemporary society. In conclusion, it is equally important for school boys and school girls to

study

local

history

as well as

world

history

.