Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some people argue that when dealing with the problems of
adult
life,
children
raised in families without large amounts of money are better prepared than raised by wealthy
parents
. In
this
essay, their argument can be a sort of conventional fallacy to people with
childhood
for 2 reasons, which are as follows. Coming across the economic hardship of
adult
life, a person brought up in a low-income family can handle their circumstances inactively enduring a lack of necessities as if they’d done for their
childhood
. Despite the fact that they are a bit familiar with the situation, there is little to no intelligence and experience for them on how to earn large amounts of money compared to their counterparts. Specifically, the poor had decided on dividing a piece of bread into some parts for sharing with siblings, while the rich one with
parents
experts in business had been frequently exposed to advanced intelligence and information. Regretfully, the difference between the two
children
remains until dealing with their difficulties in their adulthood.
Also
, a significant drawback of poor
children
is low self-esteem which is entirely formed during
childhood
and influences the problem-solving ability of their
adult
life. Because their
parents
are so busy making an income that they rarely build a good relationship with their
children
, which leads to little confidence or trust toward themselves. Many cases of
adult
depression come out originating in their unfortunate
childhood
, as Freud had referred to
this
point in his psychology thesis.
Thus
, their mental weakness can disturb overcoming the symptom itself as well as other troubles involved with their settings. To summarize, adulthood problems
such
as a shortage of earnings as well as mental illness can hardly be preempted by
children
from low-income families compared to those with wealthy
parents
.
Submitted by redrock1980 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: