IELTS Writing Samples by topic

Get a band score and detailed report instantly. Check your IELTS essays right now!
The importance of children upbringing is a frequent topic of discussion. It is argued that infants who grow in poorer families are more prepared for their later lives than kids educated by richer parents. I believe that also the latter may be ready for the adult life by facing other difficult circumstances at an early age.
Nowadays, there have been an ongoing debate about mobile phones role in the children's lives. While it is believed by some that those are detrimental to them, I strongly argue that those provide many noteworthy benefits. In this essay, I will discuss major reasons for both the views and give my opinion.
It is very difficult to say what is best for the future life of children. Parents' money is a tool, they can be used for the benefit of children or to the detriment. If parents have little money, children use the range of services the importance of which was valued by society. It is good to give children good health, a love of sports, a love of work and study, and skills to get along with other people. If the money helps, it’s good.
I agree with this statement, because problems in life are often associated with a small amount of money. Children from poor families saw their parents solve these problems. Children from poor families are accustomed to rely on their strength in competition. Public schools and scholarships provide the best types of education, regardless of the wealth of the parents in proportion to the child's abilities. You need to be not just rich but very smart so that the money does not harm the child.
Nurturing of children by parents in an environment of luxuries and adversities plays key role in dealing with the problems faced by them in adulthood. It is believed that those children who are raised in rich families are not well-equipped to deal with the adversity of grown up age compared to those who are raised in a poor family. It seems to me that I do agree with this statement because having pre-exposure to the problems faced by them during their teenage life can help them to survive in harsh difficulties of adult life and motivation of improving their social and economic status.
The ability of a child to cope up with problems if more dependent on the way the parents treat them and not by the wealth of the parents, however children who have wealthy parents are slightly off when it comes to solve their problems compared to children who have been raised by parents who are not wealthy.
Money is an important aspect in the life of human beings. Having large amounts of money makes life easier because first, children would not work hard to receive higher education and second, they will face problems regarding a secured career in the future. Thus I believe children brought up by rich parents will not be prepared to deal with the challenges faced in adulthood.
It is argued that children born to richer parents are less ready to deal with ups and downs of adult life. I support the idea that deprived children are, on the other hand, more used to coping with difficulties and take the turmoil of grown-up life more stoically.
Kids who are raised by rich parents might not be as prepared in facing problems in their adulthood as those who live in low-income families. In this essay I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both situations, explain my partial agreement to the above statement and why I believe parenting and education are the most important tools.
In this competitive world which we are living in, there are many challenges which come in our way at every turn and only those who have strong will power are ready to face them. I completely agree that children who come from families with low income are more prepared than those who belong to rich families. Working hard from scratch to achieve something and also learning new lessons from life every time it teaches are the two golden rules which mostly middle-class people follow in their lives.
In today's world, people like to live apart from their parents after they grew up. There has been a debate that children brought up in rich families are not better prepared for life whereas kids brought up in the middle class are good at dealing with problems. I will explain my reasoning in this essay.
Parenting in poor or middle-class families is quite different in the sense that their children are well constructed to face difficulties of life from the upper-status ones. I completely believe in the above-mentioned statement. However, in order to overcome the adulthood problems apart from wealth, moral values and experiences also help a lot.
It is often believed that children raised by low and middle income parents are well prepared to handle issues of adult life compared to those from high social status. I disagree with this thought, because it is my belief that how one solves problems associated with adulthood depends on how they are groomed by their guidians.
Some people argue that when dealing with the problems of adult life, children raised in families without large amounts of money are better prepared than those raised by wealthy parents. This essay will refute their argument for two reasons in economic and psychological strengths of the children born with silver spoons, which are as follows.
Some people argue that when dealing with the problems of adult life, children raised in families without large amounts of money are better prepared than those raised by wealthy parents. This essay will disagree with the statement for two reasons focusing on rich children’s strengths, which are as follows.
ome people argue that when dealing with the problems of adult life, children raised in families without large amounts of money are better prepared than those raised by wealthy parents. In this essay, the argument can be on a sort of conventional fallacy to people with poor childhood for a few actual reasons which are as follows.
Some people argue that when dealing with the problems of adult life, children raised in families without large amounts of money are better prepared than raised by wealthy parents. In this essay, their argument can be a sort of conventional fallacy to people with childhood for 2 reasons, which are as follows.
It is said that children raised by parents who are not as rich are more adaptable to difficulties in their adulthood than those growing up in wealthy households. Generally, despite the many advantages stemming from being financially superior, I tend to agree with this view.
Without a doubt there are vast differences between well-to-do families and families who struggle day to day. This is especially apparent in children’s development which manifest in their adulthood. For those who grew up in a comfortable home environment, they have more opportunities to develop their skills and confidence and can benefit from their parent’s extensive network. However, this is not always the case as money is not the only important factor; attitude places a part as well.
Do you want to check your essays?
Submit an unlimited number of essays. Subscribe right now and start improving your writing skills.