Introduction
Although
there is no doubt that crime must be punished, it is important to consider which type of penal Linking Words
system
is most appropriate. While some believe that a Use synonyms
system
of fixed sentences should be adopted, I support the view that Use synonyms
punishments
should be based on motives and circumstances.Use synonyms
Body paragraph 1
Those who advocate implementing a judicial process of set
punishments
may argue that Use synonyms
this
would make criminal trials more efficient. Linking Words
For example
, once a jury has decided a particular defendant is guilty of murder, the judge need only refer to the ‘punishment for murder’ to sentence that person to life imprisonment. The benefit of Linking Words
this
is that a huge amount of time would be saved in court, Linking Words
thus
leading to significant financial savings. Linking Words
As a result
, more money could be spent on healthcare, education and welfare.Linking Words
Body paragraph 2
However
, I would argue that the above Linking Words
system
is too rigid, and a process of ‘flexible’ Use synonyms
punishments
is much fairer. The latter punishment Use synonyms
system
, which many countries use, leaves more room for compassion toward offenders who have been blackmailed or manipulated. Use synonyms
For instance
, under Linking Words
this
Linking Words
system
, if a thief is able to prove that he had been bullied into committing his crime, he should be sentenced to less prison time than a thief who had been motivated by greed. IfUse synonyms
,
Remove the comma
apply
instead
, fixed Linking Words
punishments
were implemented, Use synonyms
this
sense of fairness and morality would be lost.Linking Words
Conclusion
In conclusion, while a legal
system
of fixed Use synonyms
punishments
might be more cost-effective and efficient, a procedure of assessing crimes based on circumstances and motives is more just, and justice, in my view, is paramount.Use synonyms