Most people believe that stricter punishments should be given for traffic offences . To what extent do you agree or disagree

The majority of people think that

punishment

for

traffic

offences

should be stricter as motor vehicle accidents are tremendously increasing. I agree with

this

argument, and

this

essay shall discuss the rationale behind my opinion. The only method to reduce the accident rate is to apply stricter

punishment

compared to the present because there is a difference in public attitude towards

traffic

offences

when the aggressiveness of

punishment

is upgraded. In all countries,

traffic

-related negligence occurs mainly in personal protective measures. Even though people are aware of the seriousness of the head injury and visceral impact by accident, most of them just avoid seatbelts and helmets due to their careless attitude.

For example

, in Bangalore, there is a great reduction in the death toll among RTA cases for the

last

two years due to strict curbs executed by the

traffic

department in the city, resulted in more use of personal protective equipment by travellers.

Additionally

, on highways execution of speed control devices at frequent intervals has shown a significant impact on the reduction of the number of accidents. Authorities charge huge amounts as compensation for high-speed drives on national highways.

Finally

, the severity of

punishment

assures more safety and security to the life and wealth of citizens.

For instance

, statistical data published recently in newspapers depict a sharp decline in the death rate with an increase in the fine amount. To conclude, stricter

punishment

decreases the

offences

on road. Even though it is harsh on the citizens to get penalised heavily for

traffic

offences

there is no better solution to curb it. So in the

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

future the government should increase the number of regulations to secure safety.