Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

It is argued by many people that government should allocate more funds to public

services

rather than to the

arts

, which they consider a waste of money. I tend to disagree with

this

statement and in

this

essay, I will discuss my opinion. It is clear that public

services

have significant meaning for society and

therefore

, the government should invest a lot of money in them.

As a result

, we can use public transport networks, hospitals, schools and so on. I agree that the expenditure on medicines is more important than spending on the

arts

,

such

as

music

or

theatre

.

However

, I do not agree that government should allocate all funds for improving public

services

instead

of wasting money on

arts

. Investments in the construction of a

music

hall or

theatre

, in the long run, could be as effective as investments in medical research. It is well known that mental

health

is vitally important as well as physical

health

and visiting a concert of classical

music

could bring the same positive result as visiting a psychologist.

Moreover

, the children could study literature by watching plays in the

theatre

and they are likely to become more interested in literature in

this

way than just reading books. To sum up, as can be seen from the points made in

this

essay, investments in

arts

could bring positive results equally with a contribution in

health

services

.

Music

and

theatre

play a considerably important role in the education of our children as well as backing the mental

health

of adults who have to cope with stress regularly. There is no doubt that problems should be prevented rather than be addressed.