Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In most societies, crime is a serious and growing problem.The issue of whether

criminals

should be locked up behind the bars or not, heated up in recent years. Personally, I believe that sending

criminals

to jails could be the best decision because of the destructive influences which they might have. In the forthcoming paragraphs, both sides of the view will be discussed. To commence, communities reckon that the best way to combat

this

problem is a prison sentence.

This

is mainly because

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

it will take away freedom from perpetrators and they cannot just walk easily in society and influence others .

For example

, vandalism actions could have an adverse effect on youngster’s behaviours.

In addition

, the crime rate will skyrocket, if there is no imprisonment for

criminals

.

On the other hand

, others argue that prisons are not practical at all. It is

initially

because a significant number of jails provides unnecessary and luxury facilities for

criminals

,

such

as TV or PS4. Following

this

, citizens are obligated to pay taxes for these inessential amenities.

Furthermore

, people who commit petty crimes,

such

as pickpocketing and shoplifting may be locked up in the same cells as murders and rapists and violent

criminals

. What is more, petty

criminals

may even learn how to commit more serious crimes when they are inside. So,

this

would have dire consequences on those people too. To sum up, many citizens claim that the best way to punish

criminals

for their actions is to sentence them to time in prison because of their bad influence; while, other people have a completely different point of view, due to the taxation issue. I reckon that the

first

statement would be the best efficient way to remedy the situation.