Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organisations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Scientific studies are salient for the

development

of countries. While some argue that it is the

governments

' responsibility to allocate funds for scientific

research

and to manage the scientific system, others believe that private organisations are more effective in assisting the scientific sector, and they should be given that responsibility. I agree with the former argument because of its financial and scientific benefit to nations. In

this

essay, I will illustrate why I consider funding and controlling scientific exploration as a governmental role. 

To begin

with, administrations should support scientific developments due to their attribute to offer reliable financial.

This

appears as

governments

offer a constant commitment to allocate adequate funds for

research

projects

without losing interest, whereas industrial organisations may deter offering money to

projects

that prove to have less impact on their productivity and financial income. Anthropology and Social studies,

for instance

, can have little interest to be funded by private organisations, though its significant impact on resolving social issues

such

as domestic violence. If these

projects

are not given attention by the government as an attempt to solve the critical national issues, their implementation will be impossible and that will affect the

development

of the nation.

Therefore

, it is pivotal to make

governments

responsible for financial support and guidance.

Moreover

, governmental management for national scientific

projects

leads to success in achieving the prospective aims towards science, individuals and society. Science should be controlled by officials, who are directly aware of the national problems that prevent social

development

. The Chinese government's control over medical

research

has lead to the

development

of a covid-19 vaccine earlier than other nations in late 2020. If these studies were managed by private companies

such

as Pfizer or Moderna, their main aim would have been reaching a profit faster than achieving reliable scientific results that could protect the individual and society.

Thus

, administrative control over scientific

research

is more effective than private control.  In conclusion, in my opinion,

governments

should have full access to fund and manage how science develops their countries. They,

furthermore

, should be responsible for allocating funds and managing the scientific

projects

implemented in their nations to achieve the best results in solving the medical, social and economic issues.