Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

The designation of any policy aiming to regulates emission from vehicles and rising in traffic density should be considered to its effects carefully. In the present era, Individuals are capable to purchase new
cars
easily by
car
loan from reliable bank institutes,
Consequently
, traffic density is gradually growing up every year.
likewise
,
car
emissions would be significantly increased through the atmosphere especially in the capital. Some
people
believe that increasing the price of
gasoline
could be break up the issues,
However
, In my point of view, I strongly disagree with the statement. The problem would not be solved by increasing the price of
gasoline
, So
this
essay will explain another process of the solution
instead
.
To begin
with, Expanding the fee of
gasoline
will be directly affected to using
cars
immediately because
people
would not be ready to pay for fuel costs due to the prices will be raised up,
however
, In the near future,
people
will be using an automobile as normal because travelling is an inevitable activity especially in the logistics field
that is
including a variety of activities together so-called supply chain.
This
is why is increasing fee measures is probably ineffective.
On the other hand
, Government should be determined environmental policy to advocate for their
people
to travelling by public transport, They can release several measures to encourage
people
to change their travelling behaviour
such
as to partially support transportation fees. Importing an electricity public transport for supporting crowd in the future,
likewise
, Designation of environmental policy to regulate in a process of automobile products
such
as controlling specification of the
car
by prohibiting to release a level of pollution not more than rules which the producer can adjust the specification follow by rules.
In addition
, The government could subsidize some of the production costs of
cars
in order to advocate automobile producers to develop their products become to Eco-friendly
cars
.
For instance
, Advocating to change
car
model from diesel engine becomes to electricity engine
instead
.
consequently
, the pollution situation will be absolutely decreased than ever which proved by the USA environmental management for a long time. In conclusion,
This
essay definitely disagrees with the increasing fee of
gasoline
measure. Obviously, there are several methods to effectively solve these problems and it was proved by developed countries in recent years.
Submitted by sohavething on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Discourage
  • Incentivize
  • Alternative energy
  • Public transportation
  • Lower-income
  • Carpool
  • Ride-sharing
  • Congestion
  • Urban planning
  • Pedestrian-friendly
  • Tax incentives
  • Electric and hybrid vehicles
  • Emissions standards
  • Cleaner vehicles
  • Congestion charges
  • Bicycle lanes
  • Sustainable
What to do next:
Look at other essays: