Museums and art galleries should show local history and culture instead of work from different countries. Discuss both views and give opinion.

At the present time, most museums prefer to keep the art of their own country.

However

, the leading

countries

try to present craft and culture from all over the world. It is believed that these galleries are built for a purpose.

In other words

, it preserves the pictures of historical moments and important events. My opinions are more inclined towards the argument of showing artwork of other

countries

as well.

Firstly

,

this

idea holds value in terms of economical growth.

For instance

, India is known for its diverse culture, language and art. The important point to be emphasized here is that, if other

countries

will display these rich sources in their museums,

as a result

of

this

, it might happen that people from foreign places would visit India in order to gain more information about the same.

In addition

to

this

, once tourists will start exploring the different regions particularly remote locations

then

tourism and employment rate will grow rapidly.

Secondly

, it is

also

beneficial for individuals who are not privileged to travel around the world but, have the desire to know about facts of civilizations.

For example

, in India Mahatma Gandhi Museums uses virtual reality technology to give a glimpse of various living organisms are found on every side of the earth. To summarise, all

countries

should encourage their people to acknowledge the diversity we have throughout the sphere

otherwise

people will have limited knowledge about other societies and

this

restricted understanding will hinder the growth of the country in long run.