Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is believed that
governmental
investment should be Replace the word
government
channeled
into railway renovation, Change the spelling
channelled
instead
of lane construction. I am of the opinion that the revitalization of roads should be taken precedence over that of railways
for numerous reasons.
From social
perspective, the ubiquity of lane transportation is undeniable since domestic Add an article
a social
merchandises
, goods, or products are Fix the agreement mistake
merchandise
transfered
to consumers by vehicles operated above the roads. In long-term objectives, if the authorities restrain the total amount of budget invested in Correct your spelling
transferred
this
sort of public infrastructure, the flow of product chains as well as domestic businesses' revenue
will come to a halt. Add the comma(s)
, as well as domestic businesses' revenue,
Besides
, for the sake of commuters, more often than not, people are inclined to drive motorcycles and cars in order to travel from place to place. Thus
, the likelihood of increasing fatal rate
is a result of inadequate investment in road construction and renovation because citizens can easily get injured by inadvertently heading into pot-holes.
Fix the agreement mistake
rates
In contrast
, advocates of the statement also
hold the view that the government should make capital investments in railways
instead
of the other as it plays a fundamental role in favor
of exportation and free trade Change the spelling
favour
agreement
. Specifically, Fix the agreement mistake
agreements
railways
can be utilized to transfer merchandises
from a foreign country in which is geographically in proximity to the host nation without dissipation of energy and resources. Fix the agreement mistake
merchandise
Nevertheless
, there are a plethora of alternative modes of transport such
as pinelines
, airways and waterways. Correct your spelling
pipelines
Consequently
, governments should cut down on the budget allocated to an unnecessary option and prioritize the most common way of transportation, especially roadways.
In conclusion, governmental investment in railways
is by no means a squandering; however
, due to the world's economic predicament, the authorities should channel money into roadways for social and national sakes.Submitted by shirley141200 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.