Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Effective methods of

students

' progress evaluation have always been an area of contention around the world. A segment of society is convinced that the most effective way to assess

knowledge

is a formal

examination

. These people believe that a continual assessment does not provide precise results. I fully disagree with

this

point of view. Because one

examination

does not assess

students

'

knowledge

thoroughly. The following paragraphs will explain my opinion along with relevant examples. To commence,

students

may not perform their best due to various reasons like

stress

and anxiety.

In other words

, a formal

examination

is a very important event,

thus

,

students

feel anxious that they may fail.

Consequently

,

stress

directly impacts performance negatively.

Moreover

, the state of health may

also

detrimentally affect

students

during the

examination

, permanently distracting them.

This

can

also

be a result of

stress

.

For instance

, many people have stomach pain when they are nervous.

Although

continual assessments

such

as course works and projects require more effort from a teacher, they can provide more precise results.

Additionally

, they take into account crucial aspects like,

for example

, discipline, punctuality, teamwork, and the like. During continual assessments,

students

can have several chances to perform well and improve their results.

Therefore

,

students

experience less

stress

. To conclude, I believe that assessing

knowledge

based on only one exam is not a good idea. They do not take into account circumstances when

students

may not perform to their best abilities. Continual assessments can more efficiently measure

students

'

knowledge

.