In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.

In

this

essay, I will compare two different opinions about the need to control

salaries

below a certain level for a little group of

people

with extremely big

salaries

. The

first

view is that the existence of a little amount of extremely rich

people

is good and the control of them is definitely bad, while the

second

view is completely opposite. On the left-hand side, a very small number of really rich

people

, cooperating with the government, can affect the rest in a sociopolitical way by spending some of their own money to make life at a certain place better without taking money from everyone around.

Also

. the control of rich peoples'

salaries

is a violation of their rights, and the violation of rights is never a good thing. On the right-hand side, the existence of a small group of really rich

people

makes the difference between them and the rest of the society bigger and bigger.

In addition

, it is really dangerous to allow their

salaries

to keep being so big

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

because the social difference can cross the line of absurd once. My opinion is that the government shouldn't allow

salaries

above a certain level, but do it very carefully, because in most cases

people

confirm the thought about huge society difference, and the government can be those

people

.

For example

, the society of the Russian Empire was built in

such

a way, where rich families were rich for generations, and poor

people

could never change their situation. Poor hated the rich and rich were treated poorly like they are not men at all.