Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others think that the circumstances of a crime, and the reason for committing it should be considered when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views.

There are two considerations regarding the sentencing process. At

first

sight, punishments for one type of

crime

should not change in different situations. Contrary to

this

belief, judges or jurors determining the

penalty

should consider the intent to create the

crime

and event-specific reasons

such

as what was stolen in a robbery case or how the murderer kills. To my way of thinking, even though fixed punishments might be deterrent, an individual fault is related to the circumstances in which it is.

Hence

, it should be judged in terms of these circumstances. Beccaria who was an 18th-century Italian jurist and criminologist argued that deterrence depends on certainty and quickness. When the court order is made definitely and quickly, criminals hesitate to commit crimes. The fixed penalties benefit not only dissuasion people but

also

protect the public from

crime

. Government should ensure the safety of the public.

For instance

, if the

penalty

of the murder is clear and the killer knows that he will be imprisoned, femicides that have been receiving widespread media coverage, can not be committed easily anymore.

Thus

, the violence might be stopped and the public might keep safe.

Moreover

, due to the judgments based on the laws, judges can neither decide from their own perspective nor take initiative.

However

, by ethical judgment, whether something is good or bad is about the intention that showing why the action was taken. There may be a number of reasons why the lawbreaker is in the position. While the court sentence the

penalty

, they should know whether the

offense

Change the spelling

offence

show examples

is a forgivable motive or not.

For example

, traffic accidents may happen with high speed, alcohol, fighting, insomnia, or carelessness. Since

this

action puts the public’s life safety at risk, there must be a

penalty

, but the cause is crucial for the accused’s trial. Wrongdoers who hit someone accidentally, steal bread from poverty, or have mental disorders should not charge in the same way as the others.

Therefore

, each

crime

should be sentenced in itself.

Finally

, fixed punishments have some advantages

such

as discouraging someone from making a mistake.

Nevertheless

, penalties should be specific to the

crime

because their drawbacks are vital to the person responsible for the action. The conditions regarding what, by whom, and how the

crime

was committed may change the result.