Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are marries or single. some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

A group of people think that seeking personal information during interviews is relevant while others oppose

this

strongly .I would like to share both views in detail and

also

dictate what should I think about

this

. Advocate think that asking personal knowledge of the interviewees will help to understand the character of them and they can easily identify whether these people are apt for

this

kind of jobs.

For instance

, a newspaper association conduct an interview and select some candidates without asking for any personal information among them one who doesn't have any interest in creativity was posted in the creativity section As a

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

result it ends in failure.categorise employees according to their interests is very important to a company's success. Vice versa, opponents think that the employer will ask you things in a negative manner.

For example

, IPS interviewees are pregnant at the time of the interview they will think that

this

will adversely affect the productivity of the club.

This

will create a negative impact unnecessarily. Are like granting maternity benefits in a short time of joining it is a complete wastage for the company. In ,conclusion my opinion is that understanding the personal information of employees up to a certain limit like marriage status area of interest work experience will help the manager to a category according to their needs

this

will make a drastic change in the company profile.