Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

It is often said that arts like

music

and

theatre

are spendthrifts of money financed by the

government

rather the money must be utilized for the development of public services. I am completely against

this

statement. I firmly believe that

this

view is incorrect, and will discuss the reasons why in

this

essay. Art is one of the prime factors which bear the cultural identity of a

nation

. Without the improvement of art, a civilization cannot exist.

For example

, the developed

nation

like the USA, UK, India, all

is

Change the verb form

are

show examples

developed in

music

and

theatre

. They are supported by their

government

. If

this

industry is not backed by the

government

, it would not flourish. Supporting

this

sector by financing is not a waste of money rather it is contributing to the

nation

.

However

, Public services like education, transport, health, and many other sectors must be key priorities of a

government

. But it cannot be only the focus point of a

government

.

Government

should have equal agenda to develop all the sectors. To compete with the developed countries, a

nation

must give uniform importance to all the sectors.

Otherwise

, it will be quite impossible to adjust to the globe.

Moreover

,

theatre

and

music

are the major factors that can make a state known to the outside world. There are some international awards that bring glory to the country. Thence,

government

finance is needed to improve

music

and

theatre

. To conclude, I feel strongly that to prosper as a

nation

in

music

and

theatre

government

financing is a mandatory subject.

However

, there may be some argument about how much funds can be allotted to

this

sector, but

this

is undoubtedly out of the question that art and

theatre

need support from the

government

.