In the request for development, many countries allow their natural environment to be affected. Such a strategy is well worthwhile, an economic development should always be placed ahead of the environment. Argue both sides, and give your opinion.

โœจ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Countries these days are giving priority to developments rather than to nature. Especially developing nations are implementing
this
Linking Words
strategy, by deforestation for making space available for infrastructure. Though some part of society believes that putting development ahead is worthwhile, In my opinion,
this
Linking Words
is a drastic mistake.
Firstly
Linking Words
, to upgrade the infrastructure facilities, large areas of real estate land are required, which has a direct impact on trees which are needed to be cut down. The flora and fauna consume 10 to 20 years in order to regain their original status.
For instance
Linking Words
, Amazon plantations are most valued which on average has a prerequisite of 25 years to regrow if cut down.
Secondly
Linking Words
, the presence of an enormous variety of industries is a must for a place to have economical advancements.
This
Linking Words
when not planned strategically will make nature worse. To illustrate, Mumbai was planned very badly that industries are located right at the heart of the city.
This
Linking Words
affected both nature and the lives of natives.
This
Linking Words
as a result
Linking Words
rather than making economical advancements would actually decline human health requiring more money to be spent on recovery.
However
Linking Words
, there should be a focus on society developments as well owing to the fact that, increased income would bring possibilities for constructing sanctuaries and reserve forests.
This
Linking Words
would make the environment much better.
Likewise
Linking Words
, when society develops the waste management methodologies
also
Linking Words
become better.
This
Linking Words
would help drastically in treating wastes in
such
Linking Words
a way that they don't intervene in natural life cycles. In conclusion, concentrating on a single factor though would bring short-term benefits, over a certain period of time it would be highly disadvantageous. So equal weightage should be given to both the influencing factors
such
Linking Words
that it would bring sustainable development.
Submitted by manojvamc on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this siteโ€™s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: