under British and Australian laws a jury is a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case do you agree or disagree ? Give reason for your answer

It is debatable whether or not the

jury

has

an

Remove the article

apply

show examples

access

for

Change preposition

to

show examples

the defendant’s past criminal information.

While

some people may think that

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

past records may provide additional details, others believe that it is highly harmful

for

Change the preposition

to

show examples

the accused person. Personally speaking, I may not agree

the

Change preposition

with the

show examples

afore- mentioned

Correct your spelling

aforementioned

show examples

statement as I tend to believe that old activities have no right to be involved in today’s cases. Despite the fact that people can change and grow after what they have been through, apparently

Add a comma

,

show examples

communities still tend to judge people by connecting their past characters easily.

Moreover

, it is wiser by any chance to

weight

Correct your spelling

weigh

show examples

only the present facts and

evidences

Change the wording

evidence

pieces of evidence

shreds of evidence

show examples

as the former facts have already been passed. By way of illustration

is

Unnecessary verb

apply

show examples

a

jury

may have accused the wrong person just because one has a bad criminal report.

Thus

, to

me

Add a comma

me,

show examples

it is only fair to

excluded

Change the form of the verb

exclude

show examples

the earlier reports.

On the other hand

, another opinion to consider is that repeated bad

behaviors

Change the spelling

behaviours

show examples

should be punished harder than the first one.

Consequently

, in

this

case,

jury

Add an article

the jury

show examples

needs to know if one had made a similar action in the past.

However

, given

this

circumstance

to

Change preposition

apply

show examples

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

me

Add a comma

me,

show examples

it is better to not implicate

this

belief. Like the previous statement, I am deeply concerned that a decision may not be valid if the

jury

had the previous files.

To conclude

, what British and Australian laws have done to hide the former facts

sound

Correct subject-verb agreement

sounds

show examples

right

Change preposition

to

show examples

for

Change preposition

to

show examples

me. An accountable judgement can be made if only the

jury

excluded past

defendants

Change noun form

defendants'

defendant's

show examples

records.