In other to reach an unbiased judgement and ensure the protection of a
, British and Australian laws restrict a
's access to the accused's
in a criminal
.
, several lawyers are proposing an amendment to
law so that a
has rights to the
past criminal
. In my opinion, I agree with the proposal, a
should be able to review a
's
before meting out their judgement.
with, concerning the argument about a biased judgement,
may be possible if the
is an individual alone or if it comprises of only a particular gender, age group, race or religion.
is not the
as a standard
is diverse, with at least 10 or 12 qualified jurors of both genders and more than one age group who are required by the law to put aside their racial or religious differences during a trial.
, it is unlikely that all members of the
will become biased after viewing the
's
, or that the
will give a verdict based on the bias of 2 or 3 jurors.
, I believe that for the appropriate verdict to be given, the nature of the offence
to whether or not the offender is a
-timer or a repeat offender should be taken into consideration. Since the
is a criminal
, it is likely that the crime in question may have caused death or harm to a
party, damage to property or the state and would require a heavy
.
, if the
is a
-timer, the
may be relatively lighter (all things being equal) than what a repeat offender will receive, and the
needs to have
information in other to give the
of deserving weight.
, it will be inadequate and a bit unfair to ask a repeat shoplifter to simply pay a fine (which is more appropriate for a
-timer) when they deserve jail time. But
may be the
if the
is kept in the dark with regards to the record.
, looking through a
's record may bring to light certain things relating to the current
that
may have been overlooked.
, after analyzing the
criminal record, it may become evident that they require some psychological or psychiatric intervention, based on the nature and pattern of the previous and current crimes. With
information, the verdict can be tailored to deliver not just judicatory
but
a solution to their mental health illness in form of rehabilitation, counselling or where necessary placed on appropriate medication.
In conclusion, even though there may be concerns about a
dishing out biased verdicts to
after going through their
, revealing these
indeed has more advantages as it makes room for not just the most appropriate weighted punishments, as in the
of repeat offenders, as well as factoring in other forms of help and rehabilitation for
who may need it.