Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
In other to reach an unbiased judgement and ensure the protection of a
defendant
Use synonyms
, British and Australian laws restrict a
jury
Use synonyms
's access to the accused's
records
Use synonyms
in a criminal
case
Use synonyms
.
However
Linking Words
, several lawyers are proposing an amendment to
this
Linking Words
law so that a
jury
Use synonyms
has rights to the
defendants
Use synonyms
past criminal
records
Use synonyms
. In my opinion, I agree with the proposal, a
jury
Use synonyms
should be able to review a
defendant
Use synonyms
's
records
Use synonyms
before meting out their judgement.
To begin
Linking Words
with, concerning the argument about a biased judgement,
this
Linking Words
may be possible if the
jury
Use synonyms
is an individual alone or if it comprises of only a particular gender, age group, race or religion.
This
Linking Words
however
Linking Words
is not the
case
Use synonyms
as a standard
jury
Use synonyms
is diverse, with at least 10 or 12 qualified jurors of both genders and more than one age group who are required by the law to put aside their racial or religious differences during a trial.
Therefore
Linking Words
, it is unlikely that all members of the
jury
Use synonyms
will become biased after viewing the
defendant
Use synonyms
's
records
Use synonyms
, or that the
jury
Use synonyms
will give a verdict based on the bias of 2 or 3 jurors.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, I believe that for the appropriate verdict to be given, the nature of the offence
in addition
Linking Words
to whether or not the offender is a
first
Linking Words
-timer or a repeat offender should be taken into consideration. Since the
case
Use synonyms
is a criminal
case
Use synonyms
, it is likely that the crime in question may have caused death or harm to a
third
Linking Words
party, damage to property or the state and would require a heavy
punishment
Use synonyms
.
However
Linking Words
, if the
defendant
Use synonyms
is a
first
Linking Words
-timer, the
punishment
Use synonyms
may be relatively lighter (all things being equal) than what a repeat offender will receive, and the
jury
Use synonyms
needs to have
this
Linking Words
information in other to give the
punishment
Use synonyms
of deserving weight.
For instance
Linking Words
, it will be inadequate and a bit unfair to ask a repeat shoplifter to simply pay a fine (which is more appropriate for a
first
Linking Words
-timer) when they deserve jail time. But
this
Linking Words
may be the
case
Use synonyms
if the
jury
Use synonyms
is kept in the dark with regards to the record.
Also
Linking Words
, looking through a
defendant
Use synonyms
's record may bring to light certain things relating to the current
case
Use synonyms
that
otherwise
Linking Words
may have been overlooked.
For instance
Linking Words
, after analyzing the
defendants
Use synonyms
criminal record, it may become evident that they require some psychological or psychiatric intervention, based on the nature and pattern of the previous and current crimes. With
this
Linking Words
information, the verdict can be tailored to deliver not just judicatory
punishment
Use synonyms
but
also
Linking Words
a solution to their mental health illness in form of rehabilitation, counselling or where necessary placed on appropriate medication. In conclusion, even though there may be concerns about a
jury
Use synonyms
dishing out biased verdicts to
defendants
Use synonyms
after going through their
records
Use synonyms
, revealing these
records
Use synonyms
indeed has more advantages as it makes room for not just the most appropriate weighted punishments, as in the
case
Use synonyms
of repeat offenders, as well as factoring in other forms of help and rehabilitation for
defendants
Use synonyms
who may need it.
Submitted by temirshakh96 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: