Some countries are struggling with increases in crime rates. Some believed that having more police on the streets is the best way to reduce and combat crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Criminal records have drastically increased during the
last
few decades in most countries. While some people are expecting a reduction in infraction rates by deploying
police
in every possible location, the rest believe in a much preventive approach. In my point of view, the strategies to reduce crimes have to be wisely decided by considering both these aspects. It is obvious that there is a high possibility of arresting the verdict if a policeman is nearby to a crime location.
Firstly
, It would be a great help to enforce the law and order, if someone who is having power and authority is monitoring the activities done by the public. Even in a court inquiry, the statement of a policeman who was at the crime location will be clear evidence to penalize the suspect.
However
,
this
will not go to decrease the domestic case rates since it is not practicable to place a
police
officer in each and every house. At the same time, even allocating
police
officers in all public locations is
also
not an economical way as a nation. In a preventive approach, measures can be taken to be aware and educate the community regarding the law and the consequences of breaking it. The practice of being a good citizen has to be developed since the early childhood of a person.
For example
, interactive awareness sessions can be arranged with the support of local
police
stations in schools or higher academy institutes.
This
will eventually create a much quality society where people follow rules and standards.
Finally
, punishment is not the only recommended way of addressing the crimes.
Further
, it is not the most economical method as well. Alternatively, preventive access as explained in the
third
paragraph would reduce the future costs in recruiting and deploying
police
officers all over the locations.
Hence
, a hybrid mechanism of both these methods would be idling.
Submitted by suga.ek on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: