The government's investment in arts, music and theater is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Many

people

believe that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

the investment in aesthete activities

such

as orchestra, theatre performances etc. is not an efficient action for

society

.

Moreover

, they claim money should be spent on public facilities

such

as the construction of a new hospital, development of transport system and so on. In

this

essay, I will discuss

this

issue from some rational angles. On one hand,

art

is a requisite for each

society

and it has several benefits.

Firstly

the creativity is being improved by the effect of the

art

. To illustrate, the result of several studies revealed that attend in classes

such

as pottery and composing music will be helpful to boost the creative mind.

Secondly

,

art

plays an essential part in the recreation of

people

.

For instance

, a large number of

people

have a plan for going to a musical performance, theatre and cinema at their weekend, as an entertainment.

as a result

, the omitting of

art

is having a detrimental effect on

society

.

On the other hand

, spending money on

art

has no contradict with investment in public service.

For example

, a greater amount of money can be devoted to reconstructing the roads, increasing the number of subway stations and education.

In other words

, by division of government’s budget according to the priority of the

society

. What is more, without

art

the lifestyle of

people

will be mundane with no thrill of excitement. To conclude, there is a belief that the national outgoings on the

art

should be cut and

this

amount should be devoted to the national facilities that belong to everyone. I strongly opine, omitting the aesthetic activities namely, music, theatre, and dance shows have negative implications on public creativity and leisure.