Some feel governments should invest in preserving minority languages, while others feel this is not a good use of resources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
In the present day, some people believe that their governments should spend money on maintaining the minority
languages
;
however
, some claim that doing
this
is not a proper way to efficiently use resources. In my view, I believe that it is not necessary to protect these
languages
. On the one hand, some linguists and sociologists argue that the protection of these
languages
should be funded by the governments. Language is the root of cultures and customs which represent the uniqueness of the society.
In other words
, the governments should assist with the preservation so that it maintains the
community
identity. To make a profit, the
government
can
also
promote the
community
by showcasing the unique identity obtained from the minority
languages
.
For instance
, the
government
can launch an advertising campaign to persuade tourists to visit the
community
. In
this
way, the
government
and
community
would indirectly receive a benefit from preserving the
languages
.
On the other hand
,
this
preservation is a waste of money. A primary reason is that investment in the minority
languages
cannot provide helpful benefits to a.
In other words
, the
government
should invest in other things
such
as public facilities to improve people’s life quality and safety
instead
.
For example
, if the
government
develops a better security system together with a good transport system, people can feel safer and more comfortable while they are living in their society.
Consequently
, funds for public facilities have more significant results on people’s satisfaction compared to a fund for a small group of
languages
. In conclusion,
although
taking care of a small group of
languages
can result in protecting the identity of the communities which speak them, I believe that the
government
should not fund these
languages
because it cannot result in significant improvements in people’s life quality.
Submitted by unnop_0007 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: