Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages a higher level of violence in that society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

#people #police #force #guns #level #violence #society

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?

There is a controversial perspective heating a debate over the impact of gun possession by the

police

Use synonyms

on the community. Personally, I would contend that doing so might do more harm than good. It is understandable to claim that

police

Use synonyms

officers should be equipped with

guns

Use synonyms

in those areas where armed criminals are rampant. By having a gun, the

police

Use synonyms

can protect ordinary citizens as well as themselves from potential attacks. It gives the

police

Use synonyms

the leverage in their combat against criminals, especially those hardened perpetrators.

For example

Linking Words

, Norway

police

Use synonyms

forces previously were not armed with

guns

Use synonyms

while doing patrols.

However

Linking Words

, after a destructive attack of the IS terrorist,

this

Linking Words

has not been the case anymore.

As a result

Linking Words

, firearms are obviously necessary since they serve as a deterrent to would-be offenders.

On the contrary

Linking Words

, polices' carrying

guns

Use synonyms

is unreasonable since it could increase the potential of a miscarriage of justice and mistaken shootings of innocent civilians. Even though the legislations are put forward to protect citizens from torture or cruel treatment, if the

police

Use synonyms

are armed, they

also

Linking Words

protect their rights on using

guns

Use synonyms

For instance

Linking Words

, the

police

Use synonyms

will be less likely to give a

second

Linking Words

thought before pulling the trigger when they see someone as a dangerous threat. They can easily get away with private execution by inventing a legitimate excuse,

such

Linking Words

self-defense

Change the spelling

self-defence

show examples

Consequently

Linking Words

, the chance of shoot-out would naturally rise, causing many preventable injuries or losses of life. In conclusion, while owning firearms is of importance, it still contributes to higher violence percentage.

Therefore

Linking Words

, it is unsuitable to apply a gun possession policy.

Submitted by hominhtrang995 on Thu Oct 28 2021

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

11
Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
2
Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1
Grammar mistakes
detected issues

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 9.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 7.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 8.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 9.0

Complete response

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

4 paragraphs

267 words

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

Topic Vocabulary:

law enforcement
escalate
deter
overreaction
perceived safety
misuse of power
deterrent effect
law and order
public safety
crime prevention
civil liberties
use of lethal force
accountability
arms race
militarization
social fabric
statistical evidence
cultural attitudes
criminal behavior
policy implications

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

5
band
In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
For several years, people have thought that owning a house is much better than renting one. Evidently, this is an idea that have sticked with people for decades and that has been linked to a normative deeply inserted in society, strictly related to the individuals' stability and social position. Above all, I think this conception can be negative for people's freedom of decision making.Now, this essay intends to explain the reasons for this case.
4.5
band
The average annual expenditure of college students from three countries.
The table depicts countries A, B, and C in terms of how much annual money is spent on accommodation, food, books, leisure, and others by college students in these nations.
5
band
In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
These days, in business there is an emphasis when showcasing products by terming them, 'brand new'. This is because people love new things. I think it is a positive strategy benefiting the company advertising and also a negative development for customers.
5
band
Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities. Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages?
In our developed world, the majority of people have a tendency to devote considerable amount of time to working rather than to relax and unwind. However, from my point of view, there are several potential drawbacks which outweigh benefits.
6
band
Both government and individual are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and healthcare. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The allocation of significant financial resources by both governments and individuals towards the protection of animals and their habitats has sparked a debate on whether these funds could be more effectively utilized to address fundamental societal issues like poverty and healthcare. In the following, I will elaborate more on why I believe that.

Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages a higher level of violence in that society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

The average annual expenditure of college students from three countries.

In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities. Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages?

Both government and individual are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and healthcare. To what extent do you agree or disagree?