Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Global environmental problems are something that every living being is having to deal with, both in the developing and developed world. Some sections of society, argue that it should be dealt with at a global

level

, whilst others argue it should be looked into from a national

level

.

However

, I believe that

this

problem should be addressed both, at a global and a national

level

. In

this

essay, we shall look at both sides of

this

coin.

First

and foremost, from a global

level

, countries need to come together to discuss the different ways in which they can individually contribute to a reduction in greenhouse gasses. But, the point to note here, is that it is only a discussion, not a confirmation of what they will do.

Also

, the availability of various delegates can prove a problem.

For example

, the recent Global Summit held in Glasgow had fewer participants as compared to previous years due to COVID restrictions. Those who did not choose to come were frowned upon, and because of

this

pressure, they later decided to make an appearance.

On the other hand

, if it is handled on a national

level

, a particular country needs to only look at their infrastructure, and see what they need to do to become greener. Based on that, they can work on timelines that they create, and don't have to live up to the mightier members targets. In conclusion, I strongly believe that environmental concerns should be addressed on a global and national

level

.

However

, from a national standpoint, they should

also

take control of their destiny, rather than let the more developed nations dictate the terms.