scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists? To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It can be argued that more resources are being invested in supporting technological experts rather than cultural activists.

Although

many would agree with

this

, some people do think the opposite.

This

essay will show to what extent I personally agree with the given statement. Today's technological progress exist only because many scientists dedicated their lives to science, researches and self-education. All familiar devices today were made to solve certain routine tasks in order to achieve fast economic growth. These requirements have to be satisfied with well-trained and smart people,

therefore

, the governments or businesses have to invest in mind resources. At the real moment, current scholarships range and supporting programs for prospective engineering alumni and PhD's is wider than for musical or art students.

Secondly

, a great number of investors do not see the income if they invest in musicians or artists. Despite the fact that there are many talented and outstanding creators with great ideas and projects, wealthy people are not attracted to their services most of the time.

Moreover

, some less known orchestras cannot even pay

to

Change preposition

apply

show examples

its musicians in

time

Add an article

the time

show examples

since usually they do not earn enough money after the concerts.

Such

talents should not be neglected, but the interest in these fields have been decreasing nowadays. To conclude my arguments, I would like to say that our gratitude to technological experts should be infinite because they have been providing humankind with lots of useful applications. But diligent and earnest representatives of art and music should be always be supported decently and now, sadly, it is not as it is.