While some people consider global warming to be the most pressing environmental problem which we have at the moment, others believe that deforestation has a more devastating impact on our world. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

During these years, environmental changes have had deleterious effects on the earth, which is a human home. Global warming and deforestation are one of these critical

problems

that need immediate action.

Although

, there is huge doubt on prioritizing movements in order to confront these upheavals. I believe none of these issues is superior to others. Undoubtedly, they are serious concerns, which entail vital solutions. In the following, I will discuss each side’s opinion separately. Global warming is one of the urgent issues. Each year, the world environment faces a temperature rise because of greenhouse gases, which are produced by fossil fuels. Arctic ice, which is

great

Add an article

a great

show examples

source of water, are decaying

as a result

of

this

rise. Organisms that rely on

this

habitat are facing troubles including resident loss, deficient foods and unsuitable temperatures.

Hence

, their population would meat decline or even immigration in order to find a fitting living place. Ice melting would contribute to

Correct article usage

an increase

show examples

increase

Change the verb form

increasing

show examples

in sea levels.

Hence

, many islands would be in an imperilment of disappearing and

therefore

their living things are jeopardized. Due to protect these organisms from extinction there should be employed instants conservation plans. Deforestations cause severe issues including soil erosion, food deficiency and habitat loss. Jungles would help the world climate to be balanced. Demolishing them could accelerate global warming too. Soil has a crucial role in human nourishment. Indeed, erosion in the soil would make various

problems

in farming and proper living places. By eradicating trees, many animals including birds would lose their home.

Thus

, they have to look for another place

that is

suitable for them. Unfortunately, there would be another compulsory immigration. In conclusion, I believe both

problems

are imperilling nutrient and organism home. In order to have an inhabitable

planet

Add a comma

,planet

show examples

there should be utilized dire conservation plans.

Hence

, posterity would be able to live on

this

planet without any critical

problems

.