Some people think that planting trees in open space cities and towns is more important than building houses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed by some that constructing new buildings on the free land in cities is more meaningful than re-planting. I strongly agree with

this

statement and I will explain my reasons to support

this

idea in the upcoming paragraph. To commence with, building new houses will benefit the society in various ways

such

as the provision of employment to the unemployed individuals, subletting the newly built structures to multinational companies to open up offices in the local areas.

For example

, in Canada, very few people are living in northwest territories because construction companies do not want to invest their money in the remote areas but if they come to know about advantages they can earn double revenue just by leasing those apartments to people who just want to travel to those regions for a limited time period.

Furthermore

, it will increase the scope of varying job possibilities for the regional residents as well. To continue, by developing new constructions, immigrants who are moving to a new country can book their house before coming to a new city as new buildings will provide accommodation to many needy families.

For instance

, real estate businesses can get a spike in

this

kind of development around the city and businessmen will get more opportunities for investments.

Additionally

, buildings provide essence to the outlook of the living areas and give financial benefit in return to the government. Summing up, in my opinion, constructing new homes is more beneficial for the authorities than reforestation because it sets support for the communities who are living away from their loved ones and a permanent place to stay.