Some people believe that vertical city in people work and live in a tall building is a good idea. Others say that horizontal living is better. Discuss both views and express your opinion.

It is generally claimed that there are two ways of living as horizontal and verticle. Differentiation is in the capacity of the land. Both of them have equal advantages like more employment and less danger. More infrastructure would provide more work in vertical style.

For instance

, If in place is situated a high building, there would a chance to have a job for a significant population, compared with the opposite living.

Additionally

, competition between results and increasing salary take place in

such

a situation.

Consequently

, leads to a positive impact on the economic side of the country. From my observation, I believe that twice as many new discloses, investigations and hard workers come from

such

cities.

However

, no person can be sure of the safety of high buildings.

This

fact is evidenced by several approvals. A good illustration is New York city where

one

structure is higher than the other but due to climate or technological influence they were destroyed taking away numerous lives of people.

Also

, there is a space for occasional situations like If

one

construction had been fired or falling

then

it would have damaged everything

next

to it. In that case, my opinion is that the horizontal way is not as dangerous as vertical. Personally, I prefer the

last

one

because I will have the opportunity to enjoy the landscape. Taking everything into consideration, the main role of choosing

one

or another style of living depends on the preference of society. In absolutely every location could be found benefits. High buildings are a good idea since they show how wide can be the imagination of community and development in technology.