As obesity has been
anChange the article
show examples
wide problem mainly
toChange preposition
show examples
the most developed countries, some governments are considering
to improveChange the verb form
show examples
the
taxes
applied on junk
food
, in
order
to make
people
avoid its
. Personally, I strongly disagree with that statement, since
this
is not going to be a solution for
this
matter.
At
first
, it is important to
considerateReplace the word
show examples
that individuals must be able to choose whatever they want to consume, even if their choice is not the best for their health. Living
onChange preposition
show examples
a
place means,
Correct your spelling
show examples
over allCorrect your spelling
show examples
, giving
people
equal rights to do anything they want, as much as it does not
inChange preposition
show examples
other's
people
choices.
This
Government suggestion would correspond as stopping selling meats in the boucheries, in
order
to impose
people
to turn vegetarians and,
consequently
, help the
of
in the air and, as well, decrease pollutions rate to the world, in a global
, while in another hand would contribute to
people
's health as an individual instance, which is a
insane idea.
Furthermore
, whereas for some
perspectiveFix the agreement mistake
show examples
processed
food
might be a
non satisfactoryAdd a hyphen
show examples
choice for some individuals, it would mean to be the only resource for others. It is explained because junk
food
as mac and cheese,
for example
, usually is way cheaper than buying proteins,
asReplace the word
show examples
rice and beans, from the
market placeCorrect your spelling
show examples
.
ThroughChange preposition
show examples
this
point of view, increasing
taxes
atChange preposition
show examples
those unhealthy items would only become a bigger problem for
society
, since probably there would be more starving
people
atChange preposition
show examples
streetsCorrect article usage
show examples
, without anything to eat in
order
to survive, which
also
could increase homeless and violence rates.
So on, indeed, it still would not be a solution for the obesity problem. It must be
that the rush on somebody's routine, summed at the way those GMO
food
save
people
's time, mainly on business
week daysCorrect your spelling
show examples
and its delightful flavour, will do contribute to
this
kind of
consumption.
Therefore
,
instead
of taking off the possibility of acquiring
these kindChange the determiner
show examples
of products, it would be more
effectivelyReplace the word
show examples
, as a Government Policy, to buzz up lectures and advertising, in
order
to teach
people
how to get
and
about what they digest and how high calories in those foods could be resulting, in the near future, in hearth diseases and be a bad choice for their health, as sides effects of its consumption.
In summary, as already exposed above, increasing
taxes
will definitely not contribute to
makeChange the verb form
show examples
people
avoid junk
food
, as it will not be a resourceful way of reducing obesity
taxes
in
society
.
This
idea would only bring more issues to the
society
and its Government, but would
also
not be solving the real
society
's obese situation.