It is often said that governments spend too much money on project to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

Many countries allocate large budgets to preserving

wildlife

,

although

there are some people who disagree because they think there are  some more important issues which need to be addressed , I strongly believe that

protection

of nature is necessary and I will explain more details in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, the

protection

of

wildlife

by authorities is important due to the crucial role of every single part of it in the ecosystem. Without a balanced and healthy ecosystem there will be several consequences for humankind, and to maintain a healthy ecological balance on the earth, all living creatures should be protected.

For example

, If a single species become extinct, the whole food chain is disrupted and it can affect humans on the top of

this

chain. So several

protection

programs in different countries to cover all parts of nature are necessary.

On the other hand

,

although

there are several issues that need to be addressed in the world, protecting

wildlife

is

also

necessary to solve some problems which have been caused by humans. The major factor that can repair the human effects on the planet is

wildlife

. Humankind activities have led to some phenomena

such

as climate change and  global warming, and the major factor which can negate the consequences is

wildlife

.

For instance

, the huge amount of emitted carbon dioxide never will be disappeared unless via photosynthesis in the forest.

Hence

we have to protect

wildlife

first

  for ourselves,

second

, for negating our impact on the planet. In conclusion,

although

there are some who believe spending a huge amount of money to protect

wildlife

is unnecessary, and it is better to spend

this

money on other issues, due to some important reasons, I think

this

protection

is vital and should be continued.