Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

A highly controversial topic today about how should we judge the performance of governments; some believe that economic indices are the best tool while others believe that other types are important. In

this

essay, I am going to examine

this

question from both points of view and

then

give my own opinion on the matter. On one side of the

argument

Add a comma

,argument

show examples

there are people who argue that

economics

is the infostructure of any

country

.

In addition

, the main reason for believing

this

is that life is governed by

economics

this

is because countries can spend on their expenditures.

Moreover

, all the treasury comes from the government's economy.

Therefore

, it is necessary to focus on the economic side to finance other's aspects of the

country

.

For example

, it is

also

possible to say that if a

country

does not have any resources will not have the ability to spend on its employees, hospitals, schools.

On the other hand

, it is

also

possible to make the opposing case

that is

often argued that authorities should consider another aspect of the

country

such

as the health sector, agriculture and education.

Moreover

, people often have

this

opinion because education will produce labours who will do the construction, manage the investor's funds, and issue the policies. A particularly good example here is that to manage the

country

resources is to have people have the ability to manage it. In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance,

however

, I tend to believe that

economics

is the science of economic's choices;

therefore

,

economics

is the fuel for other aspects of the

country

.