It is said that
raised by
who are not as rich are more adaptable to difficulties in their adulthood than those growing up in wealthy households. Generally, despite the many advantages stemming from being financially superior, I tend to agree with
view.
It is true that individuals reared in financially advantaged
are generally more well-resourced and open-minded than those brought up by
who generally could not provide the comparable social and financial resources for the development of
traits. Their visions and connections brought by their wealthy
are likely to give them a jump start in their adult lives and assist them in resolving
they encounter.
, those from
with financial constraints often find it hard to escape adversities due to the lack of
boosts and support.
, when wealthy
acquire sophisticated and well-rounded ways of being and doing alongside their
or in prestigious schools, the perspectives of individuals from deprived households tend to be constrained as they are preoccupied with meeting their basic needs.
, it is likely that adults of wealthy
are better at resolving
and challenges as they could form more comprehensive and bigger pictures of the situations.
, the key to problem-solving skills, in my opinion, is being creative and resilient, which is usually the common characteristic of people growing up in adversity. In spite of the possible lacking resources and visions,
raised by
with limited financial ability are likely to experience difficulties early on and
become more independent and resilient.
experience
sharpens
’s problem-solving skills as they have to be creative and deal with matters that frequently occur among disadvantaged people. With independence and resilience, an individual is likely to be proactive and persist when confronted with
and resolve those
on the fly with their sophisticated problem-solving skills, while their richer peers might fail to do so as they are pampered with everything sorted out for them.
In conclusion,
I agree that
of wealthy
have advantages in their future development with external social and financial support
usually unavailable to the offspring of the poor, I would argue that those from deprived
are likely to be better at solving
with their intrinsic personal traits and problem-solving experiences gained in their upbringing.