Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree?

The usage of public resources in the

arts

is constantly in question. Music and theatre are among the many artistic expressions that enjoy the benefits of

this

investment. It

is disagreed

Change to the active voice

disagrees

has disagreed

show examples

that the

Government

must invest the

art

capital exclusively in public services. Analysing the

art

sector as an economic and educational asset, as well as the importance of cultural preservation will prove

this

.

Firstly

, a lack of investment in

arts

would have a negative impact on the educational and economic system.

For instance

, in Brazil, where I am from, the

arts

are widely known as a way to keep young people in schools and away from the crime industry, especially those with limited resources. Sadly,

this

would not be possible if the

Government

discontinues that investment.

Moreover

, the

art

sector is responsible for many job opportunities and tourism, which stimulate capital circulation.

Therefore

, these make it clear that the

Government

must not invest in public services with the

art

budget.

Secondly

,

arts

are recognized around the world as a wonderful method of cultural preservation. Music and dance moves,

for example

, are passed along traditions to future generations, which keep the community culture alive.

This

is an attribute

that is

extremely important for many cultures. Due to

this

, the public resources must continue being destinated to the

arts

. To summarise, investments in the

arts

are extraordinary approaches to keep young people in school and to encourage the growth of employment opportunities and tourism expansion, as well as to keep cultures alive for the generations to come. Personally, I disagree that spending money on

arts

is a waste of money and it must be invested in public services

instead

. After analysis on

this

subject, it is proved that

Government

must not put an end to the

art

contribution and

this

capital should not be replaced by financing another sector.