Some individuals may think that the world should have just one official authority structure rather than every country having a
government
. It seems that in the present age, despite the fact that there are various national cultures having one supreme Use synonyms
government
isn't a bad idea. Now I will explain my opinion on both sides.
Use synonyms
Firstly
, in our age, there are a lot of regional committees or unions to save the environment and utilize effectively natural resources. On some occasions, those can't attain an observable result of conducting projects, reducing greenhouse gas, or slowing down climate change, due to the fact that a few countries Linking Words
government
doesn't agree and implement the suggested action against climate change. Use synonyms
For example
, there are still many countries generating their energy from fossil fuels, Linking Words
as a result
of Linking Words
this
, a huge amount of CO2 emission is produced and released into the atmosphere. Linking Words
Therefore
, if the supreme Linking Words
government
can support those environmental actions proposed, it would be a great thing in human history, and humans can save nature.
Use synonyms
Secondly
, maybe, there are many adverse assumptions about the Linking Words
government
, Use synonyms
such
as how to provide equality in all things and how to avoid losing cultural diversity. Particularly, we will lose the national specifications which we differ from other nationalities. Linking Words
For instance
, as we can see Linking Words
that is
a potential adverse effect of being one authority structure in human history. if a country is controlled by another nation, they tend to lose and mix their culture.
To sum up, comparing the mentioned advantages and drawbacks, controlling by the supreme Linking Words
government
is a much better idea for human's future, despite some cultural problems. And it may be really beneficial for those campaigns against climate change.Use synonyms
mgl2666