Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some poeple think that interviews is not a reliable mthod of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many multinational companies conduct
interviews
in order to select the best candidates for their organisation.
Although
it may be argued that
interviews
are not a reliable method of selecting a person for a job, I agree with the premise and will substantiate my reasons in the course of
this
essay. The expression "
First
impression, is the best impression" comes to mind here because
this
is what
interviews
are basically about. A company gets many applications for any given job requirement.
Therefore
in order to "thin out the herd", firms hold these formal discussions so as to gauge the interviewees.
Moreover
,
this
way the interviewer will
also
be able to assess the technical know-how of the
applicant
and his expectations.
In addition
, the temperament of the
applicant
can be assessed along with his communication level. The communication level is a very important aspect of a job because there may be situations where a potential
employee
needs to speak to senior-level managers, and if they are unable to convey their message in a simplistic manner,
then
the message gets lost.
Furthermore
, it is an opportunity for the company to provide a potential
employee
with their expectations of them, and
also
through these discussions help them to determine whether the
applicant
will suit their working environment.
Also
, through a face to face interview, interviewers can get to know through the body language and facial expressions the exact intent of the
applicant
.
This
is very important and cannot be obtained from a resume. To conclude, I believe that
interviews
are important from a company's perspective for obtaining the best
employee
for their requirement. As they are going to be paying for their services in terms of salaries, it is only fair that they get to see the potential
employee
and understand their capabilities.
Submitted by Nigelvictorlawrence on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • interpersonal skills
  • communication abilities
  • bias
  • assessment centers
  • psychometric testing
  • peer assessments
  • first impressions
  • discrimination
  • competence
  • reliable
  • selection criteria
  • holistic
What to do next:
Look at other essays: