It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The theory of evolution
species
is based on a natural process in which the most adapted
species
survives while the less adapted become extinct due to lack of the proper mechanisms to survive in a specific environment. In cases like
this
, it is acceptable and understandable that natural laws act
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
and people should not interfere.
However
, when human actions extensively impact the animal's habitat leading to its extinction, there isn't any natural process in
this
case. For a situation like
this
, I hugely support the idea that people should prevent animal's extinction. in the
first
scenario, we have the dinosaurs that were eliminated from Earth 60 million years ago.
This
event was caused by the impact of the meteor heating the Earth. Despite it sad that millions of lives were lost,
this
catastrophe allowed other
species
to be developed and restart the life on our planet. There is no proposition to rescue dinosaurs from elimination since they would not be adapted to nowadays environment. Differently from what happens with birds and felines that live in regions that suffer from fires caused by men. In order to stop the loss of birds and felines that are adapted to their habitat and only need protection from human action. The communities around the world claim to intervention on these
animal's
Fix the agreement mistake
animals'
show examples
elimination because was not a natural process, but a criminal act. In conclusion, I believe that the government should create rigorous policies and keep constant vigilance to avoid these proposal fires.
In addition
, communities should do campaigns to earn money to institutions that care for animals in threat of extinction, promoting conditions to their maintenance and reproduction. By only by gathering these strategies, we would be able to avoid losing
species
due to people actions in nature.
Submitted by evewilkens on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • extinction
  • evolution
  • biodiversity
  • ecosystem
  • habitat destruction
  • climate change
  • conservation
  • irreversible
  • ecological balance
  • species preservation
  • environmental ethics
  • sustainability
  • endangered species
  • natural selection
  • ecosystem services
  • wildlife protection
  • moral obligation
  • human intervention
What to do next:
Look at other essays: